September/October issue
Mobile working drives switch to federated access rights

William Knight
By 2007, 20 million people in Europe will be teleworking, taking
the enterprise boundary with them. Federated access rights will
lower risk and give managers the whip hand.
As society goes through changes in demographics and technology,
so work patterns evolve to accommodate them. For instance, cheaper
and more reliable communications makes outsourcing an option, not
just for global firms, but for small ones too. An ageing workforce
means paternal leave will take skilled workers out of the office,
and flexible working will become enshrined in European law. Even
so, weary commuters will demand cleaner and easier routes to work
that involve climbing the stairs, not queuing on the M25.
According to market researcher Gartner Group's Policy Issues in
Remote Access, "Organisations that do not account for virtual
work styles on business processes will waste IT dollars and employee
productivity. A failure to align processes and services to distributed
work will degrade the viability and performance of 75% of businesses."
The stakes cannot be higher. Workforce mobility — whether
driven by social mores, changing capabilities, or economics —
cannot be ignored. It is already transforming the shape of the enterprise
and dissolving the boundaries between work, home and travel.
Reggie Best, president and chief executive of Netilla Networks,
puts it like this: "An increasingly nomadic workforce, coupled
with a growth in partner extranets, has made it nearly impossible
to segregate the internal network from the outside world. Attempting
to establish trust boundaries is fruitless because the network perimeter
is disappearing."
Mobility is an information risk
With increased mobility comes a host of risks for the enterprise
(see Box 1: A mobility risk menu). But users seem alert; Gartner's
Magic Quadrant (MQ) for SSL VPNs (secure socket layer virtual private
networks) for the first half of 2004 reports that users are alarmed
by the risks of access from unmanaged, and unmanageable, end point
systems.
So they should be. In a recent survey of 100 IT managers in UK
organisations, Reflex Magnetics found that, encouraged by the need
for mobility, 85% used removable media devices to transport data
between the office and home, and 84% of businesses did not prevent
the use of removable media on the network.
In a separate study, Red-M, a vendor of intrusion detection products,
discovered it could use wireless technology from outside the buildings
to access the corporate networks of 80% of companies it surveyed.
As a first line of defence, SSL VPNs offer a good basis for securing
information for a mobile workforce. In addition, they offer flexibility
of access from any browser and the ability to act as a gateway.
This has shifted attention away from VPNs based on IPsec, the Internet
security protocols, and recent acquisitions and mergers have positioned
the SSL VPN market for a surge. According to Gartner's MQ, "Leading
network vendors are committing resources that will make SSL VPN
a considerable growth market through 2005. Smaller incumbent vendors
are fighting to stay in the race."
Gartner suggests SSL VPNs are the connection of choice for remote
workers. "By the end of 2004 most enterprises will view SSL
VPNs as a desirable method for (providing access while roaming),
and by 2005 (vendors will find) demonstrations of good roaming solutions
will be critical to win business."
A maturing market
The hunt for "good roaming solutions" is driving a trend
for vendors to bundle solutions to the various risks. According
to Juniper Network's head of corporate marketing, Peter Crowcombe,
it is the combination of the features in a reliable package that
makes the difference. Accordingly, the major vendors all provide
after-use data cleanup, granular access based on tiered authentication,
and support for mainstream authentication methods.
Tony Caine, vice president for the Europe, Middle East & Africa
division of Aventail, an SSL VPN system vendor, believes the SSL
VPN is becoming a platform of its own. "SSL VPNs are becoming
the foundation for a dedicated application access platform that
is evolving to include dynamic end point control, application security,
and intelligent authorisation and sign-on engines," he says.
"This platform is designed to handle the requirements of known
people accessing appropriately secured resources."
Fervent activity
The market has seen fervent activity. Last November, Nortel announced
the addition of SSL VPN capabilities to its Contivity Gateway portfolio,
and Checkpoint has released an SSL VPN appliance called Connectra.
Juniper Network's recent acquisition of Netscreen Technologies marched
them straight into a leading position in Gartner's Magic Quadrant
report.
According to Gartner, when the leading network vendors entered
the market, the opportunity ended for new independent gateway vendors.
Juniper's Crowcombe believes all the major players now have SSL
VPN capability and will share most of the market between them. "Those
vendors that are still independent will probably remain so or will
have to find something else to do," he says.
But while the gateway market may be maturing, Gartner sees fresh
investment in security, graphical user interfaces and management
of the client side of SSL VPNs as excellent opportunities for growth.
Is you, or is you ain't?
SSL VPN vendors tend to be neutral with regard to authentication,
preferring to integrate with mainstream practices and products.
But the explosion of types of connecting devices has created a user
community that is confused by authentication mechanisms and struggles
to remember their own PIN numbers, passwords and challenge responses,
and even to keep them secret.
John Stewart, chief executive of Signify, a managed authentication
provider, says that multiple access points cause the problem. "Clients
do not want to have to issue and manage a different form of authentication
credential (password, token etc.) for each user at each access point.
This quickly becomes a cost and management nightmare," he says.
He sees today's authentication methods as the beginning of a coalition
of security checks where personal and corporate identities merge
into one. "The ability to access many sites over the air will
be expanded to encompass more aspects of our personal and corporate
lives," he says. "Our digital identity is required for
banking and retailing, but for now we need different digital identities
for personal and corporate activities. The merging of these identities
will be achieved through coalition of services in the retail, finance
and business sectors."
This view is echoed by Mark Blowers, senior analyst at market research
firm Butler Group. He says the convergence of all technologies into
one broadband connection will see handhelds, personal digital assistants
(PDAs), laptops and phones all settle on one authentication solution,
or perhaps a solution suite.
He emphasises the need for federated authentication, which he believes
is an innovative solution to the problem of multiple sign-ons. Under
this regime an identity passes through boundaries with each layer
authenticating the layer before. As such it is ideally suited to
a mobile workforce, he claims.
Netilla's Best agrees with the idea. "Rather than provide
an external user with access to internal assets," he says,
"the forward-looking goal is to provide external and internal
users with access only to the assets that they should use legitimately.
Authentication will become more complex; federated models will prevail."
Open borders, open standards
Information security has always seemed to be an afterthought; software
developers have been keen to provide working features before worrying
about how they might be subverted. But even when they have anticipated
illegal usage, actual practice has merely highlighted the ingenuity
and creativity of the illegals in finding work-arounds. As result,
many security procedures develop in response to a known problem.
This has led a confusing landscape of switches, drop-down lists
and passwords that few understand and most resent using. If a car
had evolved in the same way, we might be speeding downhill before
being asked to sign on to the brake management system.
This approach cannot continue as the workforce goes mobile and connects
to sensitive systems through unknown devices and via insecure routes.
As with a fistful of custard, there will be leaks.
Paul Simmonds is global information security director at chemical
company ICI and spokesman for the Jericho Forum, a group of very
big IT user organisations dedicated to developing open standards
for secure, boundary-less information flow. He believes enterprise
borders will disappear when we secure the data rather than a boundary.
"A boundary does not really exist as a control point,"
he says. In his view there is no distinction between internal and
external, just users whose access to assets varies depending on
their authorisation, authentication and client device.
As ever, vendors use their own jargon to describe the concept;
boundary-less is also called de-perimeterisation or the inverted
network, and Simmonds admits the concept is a hook for looking at
security in a new way.
For him, de-perimeterisation is a change in emphasis and thinking
that he believes is sorely needed. The proliferation of products,
access methods, devices and configuration mechanisms is causing
companies to ignore security, he claims. Because of the resulting
complexity, "a lot of companies shrug their shoulders and turn
a blind eye," he says.
His view is corroborated by government statistics. In the 2004
UK DTI survey of information security breaches using remote access,
53% of the companies that used wireless networks had done nothing
about wireless security, 95% had failed to implement any additional
authentication, and 77% had not securely placed their access points.
Jericho is a formidable pressure group. With members such as ICI,
BBC, HSBC, Royal Dutch/Shell, and BP turning up the heat, vendors
are sure to pay attention to Simmonds's three essential steps to
securing the mobile workforce. These are:
• Inherently secure protocols (encrypted, authenticated,
non-repudiated) - see AS2, the specification for Electronic Data
Interchange using the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP)
• Federated identities, to enable seamless authentication
across businesses
• Inherently secure system design where additional software
or configurations are not required for products to be secure
Aventail's Caine believes SSL VPN is the obvious foundation on
which to build Jericho's walls. "While the inverted network
is more of a concept right now," he says, "we are seeing
companies starting to look at secure access in a new way, and network
administrators are already realising that they need consistent,
secure access, whether someone is remote or in the conference room."
Now that a vast number of European workers are about to go mobile,
it is not surprising that Aventail's Caine sees the SSL VPN as the
future of security for the mobile workforce. Indeed, given the plethora
of access devices and the predicted growth in the market, it is
hard to argue with him when he suggests the SSL VPN will evolve
from secure remote access from anywhere to secure access from everywhere.
Until, that is, the Next Big Thing.
William Knight is a technology writer with 18 years experience
in Software Development and IT consulting. He writes for titles
that include: Computing, JavaPro and Gantthead.com
Back to features index
|